14  at

14.0.0.1 bases lexicais

id: http://lila-erc.eu/data/id/lemma/87415
classe: conjunção coordenativa
paradigma: indeclinável
outras grafias: ad
variantes do lema:

no data

ăt

no data

14.0.0.2 dicionários tradicionais

at
conj.
Obs.: Como conj. adversativa, e frequentemente empregada para reforçar o sentido de outras partículas, como: contra, tamen, enim: «mas ao contrário», “mas no entanto”, “mas com efeito”.

1   Por outro lado, por outra parte, mas, mas por outro lado, mas ao contrário   Cíc. Planc. 11.
2   Pelo menos, ao menos:  
3   Mas talvez, mas acaso   Cíc. At. 15, 4, 3.

[EXEMPLOS]

2
sit fur, sit sacrilegus … at est bonus imperator Cíc. Verr. 5, 44 «que seja ladrão, que seja ímpio… ao menos é um bom general».

no data

At
conjunç.

1Cic.   mas, porém, ao menos.

At
Componitur cum enim, ut: At enim, & idem valet, quod Atqui.

1   mas   Conjuctio principiis apta, praesertim, ut irae aestum, dolorem, minas, vel querelas significatiùs ostendamus
2ponitur & pro Saltem   ao menos
3pro Tamen   com tudo
4pro Atqui   mas, com tudo, certamente

[EXEMPLOS]

1
at tibi   pro scelere Dii persolvant grates dignas
at ut scelesta sola secum murmurat

At
coniũctio increpatiua.

1   ay. ou mas

14.0.0.3 dados de corpus

This chart plots collocate by scoreSUBST, for the headword at here are all the values plotted: collocate: uersus; scoreSUBST: 3. collocate: ille; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: enim; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: accipio; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: nos; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: quis; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: tu; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: nunc; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: hic; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: possum; scoreSUBST: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreADJ, for the headword at here are all the values plotted: collocate: uersus; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: ille; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: enim; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: accipio; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: nos; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: quis; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: tu; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: nunc; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: hic; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: possum; scoreADJ: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreVERBO, for the headword at here are all the values plotted: collocate: uersus; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: ille; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: enim; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: accipio; scoreVERBO: 2. collocate: nos; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: quis; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: tu; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: nunc; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: hic; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: possum; scoreVERBO: 2

This chart plots collocate by scoreADV, for the headword at here are all the values plotted: collocate: uersus; scoreADV: 0. collocate: ille; scoreADV: 0. collocate: enim; scoreADV: 2. collocate: accipio; scoreADV: 0. collocate: nos; scoreADV: 0. collocate: quis; scoreADV: 0. collocate: tu; scoreADV: 0. collocate: nunc; scoreADV: 1. collocate: hic; scoreADV: 0. collocate: possum; scoreADV: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreFUNC, for the headword at here are all the values plotted: collocate: uersus; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: ille; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: enim; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: accipio; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: nos; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: quis; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: tu; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: nunc; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: hic; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: possum; scoreFUNC: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by author_Frequencies. The Horatius subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 33.74 and an absolute frequency of 38. The Tacitus subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 3.43 and an absolute frequency of 1. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Tacitus with the normalized value of 3.43 and an absolute freqeuncy of 1. here are all the values: subcorpus: Caesar ; normalized frequency: 13 ; absolute frequency: 4.90973638492333. subcorpus: Cicero ; normalized frequency: 135 ; absolute frequency: 8.40995738954923. subcorpus: Horatius ; normalized frequency: 38 ; absolute frequency: 33.7447828789628. subcorpus: Ovidius ; normalized frequency: 8 ; absolute frequency: 13.7268359643102. subcorpus: Phaedrus ; normalized frequency: 10 ; absolute frequency: 15.181417944436. subcorpus: Sallustius ; normalized frequency: 18 ; absolute frequency: 16.6960393284482. subcorpus: Seneca ; normalized frequency: 51 ; absolute frequency: 9.51829939717437. subcorpus: Suetonius ; normalized frequency: 1 ; absolute frequency: 11.0253583241455. subcorpus: Tacitus ; normalized frequency: 1 ; absolute frequency: 3.43288705801579. subcorpus: Vergilius ; normalized frequency: 12 ; absolute frequency: 23.1660231660232. subcorpus: Hieronymus ; normalized frequency: 5 ; absolute frequency: 11.2334306897326

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by genre_Frequencies. The Poesia.lírica subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 32.81 and an absolute frequency of 39. The Poesia.trágica subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 12.16 and an absolute frequency of 14. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Prosa.epistolográfica with the normalized value of 3.97 and an absolute freqeuncy of 15. here are all the values: subcorpus: Prosa.histórica ; normalized frequency: 33 ; absolute frequency: 8.03330168699335. subcorpus: Prosa.filosófica ; normalized frequency: 53 ; absolute frequency: 8.73132238348627. subcorpus: Prosa.oratória ; normalized frequency: 104 ; absolute frequency: 9.98531007268154. subcorpus: Prosa.epistolográfica ; normalized frequency: 15 ; absolute frequency: 3.97466811521238. subcorpus: Poesia.lírica ; normalized frequency: 39 ; absolute frequency: 32.8089509548246. subcorpus: Poesia.didática ; normalized frequency: 17 ; absolute frequency: 14.4202222410722. subcorpus: Poesia.trágica ; normalized frequency: 14 ; absolute frequency: 12.1612230715775. subcorpus: Poesia.épica ; normalized frequency: 12 ; absolute frequency: 23.1660231660232. subcorpus: Prosa.ficcional ; normalized frequency: 5 ; absolute frequency: 11.2334306897326

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by period_Frequencies. The IV.d.C. subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 11.23 and an absolute frequency of 5. The I.d.C. subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 10.4 and an absolute frequency of 68. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is II.d.C. with the normalized value of 5.24 and an absolute freqeuncy of 2. here are all the values: subcorpus: I.a.C. ; normalized frequency: 217 ; absolute frequency: 10.1000698161508. subcorpus: I.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 68 ; absolute frequency: 10.4023252256387. subcorpus: II.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 2 ; absolute frequency: 5.23560209424084. subcorpus: IV.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 5 ; absolute frequency: 11.2334306897326

at quibus seruis
Cic.Cael.57
Mas a quais escravos? [JDD]

At ille : respondit
Phaed.1.25
Mas aquele. [JDD]

at quod erat tempus
Cic.Mil.39
Mas que circunstância era essa? [JDD]

at quam sententiam dixi
Cic.Dom.9
Mas que parecer eu proferi? [JDD]

At ille lentus : inquit
Phaed.1.15
Mas aquele, tranquilo. [JDD]

at potest ille aliquid praetermittere
Cic.Att.3.15.3
Mas ele pode deixar de lado alguma coisa. [JDD]

at te Romae non fore
Cic.Att.5.20.7
Só que tu não estarás em Roma! [JDD]

at ille uoluntate hospitem necessitate hostem
Cic.Phil.12.27.8
E ele: “Pela vontade, hóspede, pela necessidade, inimigo.” [JDD]

at hoc solum Africani monumentum uiolasti
Cic.Ver.2.4.84.1
84 Mas só violaste esse monumento do Africano? [JDD]

at in qua causa non potuisse
Cic.Mil.102
Mas em qual causa eu não foste capaz? [JDD]

at ille noris nos inquit docti sumus
Hor.S.1.9.6
E ele: “Tu me conheces”, diz, “sou um homem letrado”. [JDD]

at enim in praeturae petitione prior renuntiatus est Seruius
Cic.Mur.35
“Sim, mas na candidatura a pretor Sérvio foi proclamado em primeiro”. [JDD]

at enim liberum senatus iudicium propter metum non fuit
Cic.Dom.10
10 Mas, de fato, o julgamento do senado não foi livre, por causa do medo. [JDD]

at eodem te cum cenauisses rediturum dixeras itaque fecisti
Cic.Deiot.19
No entanto, tinhas dito que, depois de teres jantado, voltarias ao mesmo local e assim o fizeste. [JDD]

at ne Bruto quidem id enim fortasse quispiam improbus dixerit
Cic.Phil.10.12.1
Mas Bruto também não; pois talvez algum descarado dirá isto. [JDD]

at te eadem tua fortuna seruauit in cubiculo malle dixisti
Cic.Deiot.21
Mas aquela mesma boa sorte tua te salvou: disseste que preferias no quarto.” [JDD]

at hoc nunc laus illi debetur et a me gratia maior
Hor.S.1.6.87
mas é por isso que agora lhe é devido por mim o maior louvou e agradecimento. [JDD]

at uero nos uicesimum iam diem patimur hebescere aciem horum auctoritatis
Cic.Catil.1.4.9
Mas nós, na verdade, já há dezenove dias toleramos que a espada da autoridade destes esteja embotada. [JDD]

nam in ceteris rebus cum uenit calamitas tum detrimentum accipitur at in uectigalibus non solum aduentus mali sed etiam metus ipse adfert calamitatem
Cic.Man.15
Pois nos outros casos, no momento em que chega o infortúnio, sofre-se o dano; mas, no caso dos impostos, não só a chegada do mal, mas também o próprio medo dele ocasionam o infortúnio [JDD]

14.0.0.4 Diagrama de Zipf

this chart shows that the frequency of at is 292 or, 10.12 per 10000 words. By frequency, at ranks 124th out of 11113