77  inquam

77.0.0.1 bases lexicais

id: http://lila-erc.eu/data/id/lemma/108033
classe: verbo
paradigma: irregular
outras grafias: inquio
variantes do lema:

inquam, inquio presente | indicativo | 1ª pessoa singular | voz ativa
inquere presente | infinitivo | ativo
inquiet futuro | indicativo | 3ª pessoa singular | voz ativa
inquii pretérito perfeito | indicativo | 1ª pessoa singular | voz ativa

inquăm
inquĭs

77.0.0.2 dicionários tradicionais

inquam -is -it
v. defect.
Obs.: É usado frequentemente depois de uma palavra para a qual se quer chamar a atenção do leitor, principalmente nas anáforas. Além das formas do ind. pres. sing. e 3ª do pl., são ainda encontradas: pret. perf. ind. inquii Catul. 10. 27; inquisti C ie. De Or. 2. 259; impetat. inque Plaul. Bac. 883; inquito Plaut, Aul. 788: fut. inquies Cíc. Oro 101; inquiet Cíc. Fin. 4. 71.

1   Digo, dizes, diz:  
2Sent. indeterminado:   diz-se   C íc. Tusc. 3. 71.

[EXEMPLOS]

1
inquam et inquit interponere Cíc. Lae, 3, “intercalar: digo e diz”.

inque
imperat. de inquam Plaul. Bac. 883.
inquĭī
perf. de inquam Catul 10. 27.
1 inquĭēs
2ª pess, sing, fut. de inquam Cíc.Or. 101.

no data

Inquam -is
Cic.
v. Inquio. Inquio -is -it
verbo defect.

1Catul.   dizer.

Inquam -is

1   dizer, affirmar   dat.

Inquio

1   dizer, affirmar   dat.

Inquam

1   torno à dizer

Inquio is

1   dizer

77.0.0.3 dados de corpus

This chart plots collocate by scoreSUBST, for the headword inquam here are all the values plotted: collocate: ergo; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: quomodo; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: iste; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: uos; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: ego; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: sic; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: quaero; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: hic; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: ille; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: tu; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: sum; scoreSUBST: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreADJ, for the headword inquam here are all the values plotted: collocate: ergo; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: quomodo; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: iste; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: uos; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: ego; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: sic; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: quaero; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: hic; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: ille; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: tu; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: sum; scoreADJ: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreVERBO, for the headword inquam here are all the values plotted: collocate: ergo; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: quomodo; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: iste; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: uos; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: ego; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: sic; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: quaero; scoreVERBO: 2. collocate: hic; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: ille; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: tu; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: sum; scoreVERBO: 1

This chart plots collocate by scoreADV, for the headword inquam here are all the values plotted: collocate: ergo; scoreADV: 0. collocate: quomodo; scoreADV: 2. collocate: iste; scoreADV: 0. collocate: uos; scoreADV: 0. collocate: ego; scoreADV: 0. collocate: sic; scoreADV: 2. collocate: quaero; scoreADV: 0. collocate: hic; scoreADV: 0. collocate: ille; scoreADV: 0. collocate: tu; scoreADV: 0. collocate: sum; scoreADV: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreFUNC, for the headword inquam here are all the values plotted: collocate: ergo; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: quomodo; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: iste; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: uos; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: ego; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: sic; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: quaero; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: hic; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: ille; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: tu; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: sum; scoreFUNC: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by author_Frequencies. The Phaedrus subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 104.75 and an absolute frequency of 69. The Sallustius subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 1.86 and an absolute frequency of 2. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Suetonius with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: Caesar ; normalized frequency: 3 ; absolute frequency: 1.13301608882846. subcorpus: Cicero ; normalized frequency: 140 ; absolute frequency: 8.72143729286586. subcorpus: Horatius ; normalized frequency: 18 ; absolute frequency: 15.9843708374034. subcorpus: Ovidius ; normalized frequency: 4 ; absolute frequency: 6.86341798215511. subcorpus: Phaedrus ; normalized frequency: 69 ; absolute frequency: 104.751783816608. subcorpus: Sallustius ; normalized frequency: 2 ; absolute frequency: 1.85511548093869. subcorpus: Seneca ; normalized frequency: 104 ; absolute frequency: 19.4098654373752. subcorpus: Suetonius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Tacitus ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Vergilius ; normalized frequency: 3 ; absolute frequency: 5.79150579150579. subcorpus: Hieronymus ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by genre_Frequencies. The Poesia.didática subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 61.92 and an absolute frequency of 73. The Prosa.filosófica subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 18.95 and an absolute frequency of 115. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Poesia.trágica with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: Prosa.histórica ; normalized frequency: 5 ; absolute frequency: 1.21716692227172. subcorpus: Prosa.filosófica ; normalized frequency: 115 ; absolute frequency: 18.9453221528476. subcorpus: Prosa.oratória ; normalized frequency: 85 ; absolute frequency: 8.1610707324801. subcorpus: Prosa.epistolográfica ; normalized frequency: 44 ; absolute frequency: 11.6590264712896. subcorpus: Poesia.lírica ; normalized frequency: 18 ; absolute frequency: 15.1425927483806. subcorpus: Poesia.didática ; normalized frequency: 73 ; absolute frequency: 61.9221307998982. subcorpus: Poesia.trágica ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Poesia.épica ; normalized frequency: 3 ; absolute frequency: 5.79150579150579. subcorpus: Prosa.ficcional ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by period_Frequencies. The I.d.C. subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 27.08 and an absolute frequency of 177. The I.a.C. subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 7.73 and an absolute frequency of 166. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is II.d.C. with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: I.a.C. ; normalized frequency: 166 ; absolute frequency: 7.72632068885269. subcorpus: I.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 177 ; absolute frequency: 27.0766406608536. subcorpus: II.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: IV.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0

quomodo inquis exibo
Sen.Ep.19.8
“Como sairei disso?” dizes. [JDD]

quid ergo inquis
Sen.Ep.9.22
“O que então?” dizes [JDD]

ille inquies ut ferebat
Cic.Att.4.18.1
“Ele”, dirás, “como estava aguentando?” [JDD]

horum inquit eram conscius
Cic.Deiot.21
“Disso” diz “eu era sabedor.” [JDD]

vos quantum inquam debetis
Cic.Att.5.21.12
“E vós?” digo eu “Quanto deveis?” [JDD, de outra edição]

At ille lentus : inquit
Phaed.1.15
Mas aquele, tranquilo. [JDD]

opus est inquam rationes conferatis
Cic.Att.5.21.12
O que é preciso” eu digo “é que compareis as contas.” [JDD, de outra edição]

quousque inquit hunc regem feremus
Cic.Att.1.16.10
“Até quando”, diz ele, “vamos suportar este rei?” [JDD]

istos inquies mercede conductos habebimus
Cic.Att.2.1.8
Dirás: “Teremos que obter o apoio desses com dinheiro?” [JDD]

sic inquam in animo est
Cic.Att.2.5.2
Assim, eu digo, está em meu ânimo. [JDD]

nulla mihi inquam relligio est
Hor.S.1.9.70
“Eu não tenho nenhuma superstição”, digo eu. [JDD, de outra edição]

iuranti inquit tibi non crediderunt
Cic.Att.1.16.10
“Mesmo jurando”, ele diz, “não acreditaram em ti” [JDD]

multo haec inquam nostra res maior
Cic.Att.1.16.5
este meu caso, eu garanto, foi muito maior. [JDD]

oppressos vos inquit tenebo exercitu Caesaris
Cic.Att.2.16.2
“Eu vos manterei oprimidos”, diz ele, “por meio do exército de César.” [JDD]

ego uero istud non postulo inquies
Cic.Lig.12
“Mas eu não postulo isso”, dirás. [JDD]

mihi vero inquam viginti quinque iudices crediderunt
Cic.Att.1.16.10
“Na verdade”, eu digo, “25 juízes acreditaram em mim. [JDD, de outra edição]

non quaero inquit istos quicumque ordinem duxit iudicet
Cic.Phil.1.20.7
“Não busco esses”, diz: “qualquer um que comandou uma centúria, pode ser juiz.” [JDD]

Hominem inquit quaero , et abiit festinans domum .
Phaed.3.19
“Procuro um homem”, diz ele. E foi apressado para casa. [JDD]

Regem appellas inquam cum Rex tui mentionem nullam fecerit
Cic.Att.1.16.10
“Me chamas rei”, eu digo, “quando Rei [cunhado de Clódio] não fez nenhuma menção a ti” [no testamento]. [JDD]

certe inquit ridens nam nisi tu amisisses numquam recepissem
Cic.Sen.11
disse rindo: “Com certeza, pois se tu não a tivesses perdido, eu nunca a teria recuperado.” [JDD]

et inimicissimus quidem Caesaris et ut omnia inquit ista rescindat
Cic.Att.2.12.2
“E na verdade inimicíssimo de César”, diz, “e pretendendo anular todos os seus atos”. [JDD]

illi inquam urbi fortissime conanti e manibus est ereptus Antonius
Cic.Phil.12.7.16
Das mãos daquela, eu digo, daquela cidade que com muita valentia tentava, Antônio foi resgatado. [JDD]

77.0.0.4 Diagrama de Zipf

this chart shows that the frequency of inquam is 343 or, 11.89 per 10000 words. By frequency, inquam ranks 107th out of 11113