51  ergo

51.0.0.1 bases lexicais

 

id: http://lila-erc.eu/data/id/lemma/101415
classe: partícula
paradigma: indeclinável
outras grafias:
variantes do lema:

no data

ergō

no data

51.0.0.2 dicionários tradicionais

 

1 ergō
conj.
Obs.: Quanto à quantidade, observe-se que por vezes apareee com -ò a partir de Ovídio Ov. Tr. 1. 1.87; Juv. 13.204.

1     Portanto, por conseguinte, pois logo   Cíc. Fin. 2, 97.

no data

Ergo
conjunç.

1   Cic.   mas, assim que, por tanto, pois, por causa.

Ergo

1   por tanto, ou logo

Ergo
coniũctio.

1   por tanto. ou asi que

51.0.0.3 dados de corpus

 

This chart plots collocate by scoreSUBST, for the headword ergo here are all the values plotted: collocate: quomodo; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: quis; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: inquam; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: hic; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: ille; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: sum; scoreSUBST: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreADJ, for the headword ergo here are all the values plotted: collocate: quomodo; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: quis; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: inquam; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: hic; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: ille; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: sum; scoreADJ: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreVERBO, for the headword ergo here are all the values plotted: collocate: quomodo; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: quis; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: inquam; scoreVERBO: 2. collocate: hic; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: ille; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: sum; scoreVERBO: 2

This chart plots collocate by scoreADV, for the headword ergo here are all the values plotted: collocate: quomodo; scoreADV: 2. collocate: quis; scoreADV: 0. collocate: inquam; scoreADV: 0. collocate: hic; scoreADV: 0. collocate: ille; scoreADV: 0. collocate: sum; scoreADV: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreFUNC, for the headword ergo here are all the values plotted: collocate: quomodo; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: quis; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: inquam; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: hic; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: ille; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: sum; scoreFUNC: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by author_Frequencies. The Seneca subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 18.85 and an absolute frequency of 101. The Cicero subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 3.18 and an absolute frequency of 51. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Caesar with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: Caesar ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Cicero ; normalized frequency: 51 ; absolute frequency: 3.17709501382971. subcorpus: Horatius ; normalized frequency: 3 ; absolute frequency: 2.6640618062339. subcorpus: Ovidius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Phaedrus ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Sallustius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Seneca ; normalized frequency: 101 ; absolute frequency: 18.8499654728355. subcorpus: Suetonius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Tacitus ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Vergilius ; normalized frequency: 1 ; absolute frequency: 1.93050193050193. subcorpus: Hieronymus ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by genre_Frequencies. The Prosa.filosófica subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 18.12 and an absolute frequency of 110. The Prosa.oratória subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 2.78 and an absolute frequency of 29. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Prosa.histórica with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: Prosa.histórica ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Prosa.filosófica ; normalized frequency: 110 ; absolute frequency: 18.1216124940281. subcorpus: Prosa.oratória ; normalized frequency: 29 ; absolute frequency: 2.78436530872851. subcorpus: Prosa.epistolográfica ; normalized frequency: 12 ; absolute frequency: 3.1797344921699. subcorpus: Poesia.lírica ; normalized frequency: 3 ; absolute frequency: 2.52376545806343. subcorpus: Poesia.didática ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Poesia.trágica ; normalized frequency: 1 ; absolute frequency: 0.868658790826963. subcorpus: Poesia.épica ; normalized frequency: 1 ; absolute frequency: 1.93050193050193. subcorpus: Prosa.ficcional ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by period_Frequencies. The I.d.C. subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 15.45 and an absolute frequency of 101. The I.a.C. subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 2.56 and an absolute frequency of 55. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is II.d.C. with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: I.a.C. ; normalized frequency: 55 ; absolute frequency: 2.55992552943914. subcorpus: I.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 101 ; absolute frequency: 15.4505124674927. subcorpus: II.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: IV.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0

quid ergo
Cic.Att.2.1.8
E então? [JDD]

quo modo ergo absolutus
Cic.Att.4.18.1
Como então foi absolvido? [JDD]

quomodo ergo ad illam accedit
Sen.Ep.9.12
“Como então chega a ela?” [JDD]

quid quid ergo mentitus est
Sen.Ep.21.4
Por acaso ele então mentiu? [JDD]

quomodo ergo illud bonum est cum haec non sint
Sen.Ep.118.13
De que modo, então, aquele é um bem quando estas não são? [JDD]

51.0.0.4 Diagrama de Zipf

this chart shows that the frequency of ergo is 156 or, 5.41 per 10000 words. By frequency, ergo ranks 258th out of 11113