142  quia

142.0.0.1 bases lexicais

id: http://lila-erc.eu/data/id/lemma/121166
classe: conjunção subordinativa
paradigma: indeclinável
outras grafias:
variantes do lema:

no data

quĭă

no data

142.0.0.2 dicionários tradicionais

quia
conj.
Obs.: Constrói-se em correlação com eo, hoc, ideo, idcirco, ob id, propterea, ea re Cíc. Tusc. 1, 13: Cíc. Rep. 3, 45: T. Lív. 2, 1, 7. Geralmente com o verbo no indicativo Cíc. Mur. 51, porém, o subjuntivo pode ser empregado no estilo indireto Cíc. Nat. 2, 69. ou indicando simples hipótese Cíc. Tusc. 1. 1.

1   Porque.  

no data

Quia
conj.

1Cic.   porque.

Quia

1   porque

Quia
coniunctio.

1   porque

142.0.0.3 dados de corpus

This chart plots collocate by scoreSUBST, for the headword quia here are all the values plotted: collocate: non; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: an; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: sed; scoreSUBST: 0. collocate: nihil; scoreSUBST: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreADJ, for the headword quia here are all the values plotted: collocate: non; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: an; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: sed; scoreADJ: 0. collocate: nihil; scoreADJ: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreVERBO, for the headword quia here are all the values plotted: collocate: non; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: an; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: sed; scoreVERBO: 0. collocate: nihil; scoreVERBO: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreADV, for the headword quia here are all the values plotted: collocate: non; scoreADV: 3. collocate: an; scoreADV: 0. collocate: sed; scoreADV: 0. collocate: nihil; scoreADV: 0

This chart plots collocate by scoreFUNC, for the headword quia here are all the values plotted: collocate: non; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: an; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: sed; scoreFUNC: 0. collocate: nihil; scoreFUNC: 0

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by author_Frequencies. The Hieronymus subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 47.18 and an absolute frequency of 21. The Phaedrus subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 24.29 and an absolute frequency of 16. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Caesar with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: Caesar ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Cicero ; normalized frequency: 76 ; absolute frequency: 4.7344945304129. subcorpus: Horatius ; normalized frequency: 6 ; absolute frequency: 5.32812361246781. subcorpus: Ovidius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Phaedrus ; normalized frequency: 16 ; absolute frequency: 24.2902687110976. subcorpus: Sallustius ; normalized frequency: 16 ; absolute frequency: 14.8409238475095. subcorpus: Seneca ; normalized frequency: 66 ; absolute frequency: 12.3177992198727. subcorpus: Suetonius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Tacitus ; normalized frequency: 5 ; absolute frequency: 17.164435290079. subcorpus: Vergilius ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Hieronymus ; normalized frequency: 21 ; absolute frequency: 47.1804088968771

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by genre_Frequencies. The Prosa.ficcional subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 47.18 and an absolute frequency of 21. The Poesia.didática subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 13.57 and an absolute frequency of 16. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is Poesia.épica with the normalized value of 0 and an absolute freqeuncy of 0. here are all the values: subcorpus: Prosa.histórica ; normalized frequency: 21 ; absolute frequency: 5.11210107354123. subcorpus: Prosa.filosófica ; normalized frequency: 82 ; absolute frequency: 13.5088384046391. subcorpus: Prosa.oratória ; normalized frequency: 44 ; absolute frequency: 4.22455426151911. subcorpus: Prosa.epistolográfica ; normalized frequency: 15 ; absolute frequency: 3.97466811521238. subcorpus: Poesia.lírica ; normalized frequency: 6 ; absolute frequency: 5.04753091612686. subcorpus: Poesia.didática ; normalized frequency: 16 ; absolute frequency: 13.5719738739503. subcorpus: Poesia.trágica ; normalized frequency: 1 ; absolute frequency: 0.868658790826963. subcorpus: Poesia.épica ; normalized frequency: 0 ; absolute frequency: 0. subcorpus: Prosa.ficcional ; normalized frequency: 21 ; absolute frequency: 47.1804088968771

This charts plots the frequency of lemma by period_Frequencies. The IV.d.C. subcorpus registers the highest normalized frequency, with the value of 47.18 and an absolute frequency of 21. The II.d.C. subcorpus follows, with a normalized frequency of 13.09 and an absolute frequency of 5. the subcorpus with the least normalized frequency is I.a.C. with the normalized value of 4.56 and an absolute freqeuncy of 98. here are all the values: subcorpus: I.a.C. ; normalized frequency: 98 ; absolute frequency: 4.5613218524552. subcorpus: I.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 82 ; absolute frequency: 12.5439804191525. subcorpus: II.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 5 ; absolute frequency: 13.0890052356021. subcorpus: IV.d.C. ; normalized frequency: 21 ; absolute frequency: 47.1804088968771

quia non auget sed implet
Sen.Ep.118.16
Porque ele não aumenta, mas completa. [JDD]

eum quia non videbam abesse putabam
Cic.Att.4.8A.3
Eu, porque não o via, achava que ele estava ausente. [JDD]

an quia grauius est uerberari quam necari
Sal.Cat.51.23
Acaso porque é mais grave ser açoitado do que ser morto? [JDD]

utebamur enim illis non quia debebamus sed quia habebamus
Sen.Ep.123.6
pois as usávamos não porque devíamos, mas porque as tínhamos. [JDD]

quia non alio facinore clari homines alio obscuri necantur
Cic.Mil.17
Porque homens ilustres não são assassinados por um tipo de crime, e homens obscuros, por outro. [JDD]

sed quia rationem habendam maxime arbitror pacis atque oti
Cic.Phil.1.16.2
- mas porque julgo que é preciso sobretudo levar em conta a paz e a tranquilidade. [JDD, de outra edição]

an quia non condemnaui sententia mea duo consules sum reprehendendus
Cic.Dom.9
9 Por acaso devo ser repreendido porque não condenei com meu parecer os dois cônsules? [JDD]

accipere potuistis sed ne nunc quidem auferetis quia nihil eripitur nisi retinenti
Sen.Prov.5.6
Pudestes receber. Mas nem mesmo agora me arrebatareis, porque nada se tira, a não ser para quem retém.” [JDD]

142.0.0.4 Diagrama de Zipf

this chart shows that the frequency of quia is 206 or, 7.14 per 10000 words. By frequency, quia ranks 192th out of 11113